3 Idiots - Myth Busted!

No I am not referring to the chetan bhagat controversy. Honestly I dont give a damn. I enjoyed the movie, Aamir rocks and its great entertainment with loads of message without getting all preachy up your a$$.

However there are some technical glitches. In two scenes, it is shown that a person urinating on an electrified device gets his manhood electrocuted. This is not possible. How do i know ? There was an episode on the popular television series Mythbusters (on Discovery) where they test exactly this urban legend. You can read about the myth at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Patrick_O%27Malley.

Currently I am trying to get my hands on the episode. I had watched it long long back but i vividly remember how they had done it. They made a human model and filled it with urine (fresh out of a real human bladder). They had already measured the pressure with which a normal human being can urinate and then adjusted the model's "bladder" to that pressure. The model was finally made to urinate on an electrified metal strip. Result. No electrocution. Then they gradually increased the pressure to the point where electrocution finally takes place. However the pressure at which this takes place will take super human effort.

Conclusion. You cannot get an electric shock from urinating on an elctrified object (unless you are superman, spiderman or Shakti-man and really pissed off)

Further conclusion. It is not surprising that no reports have come in of children/teenagers getting electrocuted due to such pranks being played by their peers after watching the movie. I am sure they have tried, and thankfully failed.

Cheers
Rishi

28 Lacs

That is the amount I saved by booking a flat in early 2007, as against my neighbours who booked theirs in late 2008. Am I happy? Check this link for the answer.

http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/the_happiness_genie/

Rishi.

Online recommendations on Linkedin.

I want to ask one question.

If I recommend you in a public website such as linkedin, will I write bad or even average about you? Pay attention to the fact that the requestor can choose not to publish recommendations if he does not find it appropriate.

In other words, does it even make sense to write unending paragraphs glorifying a person? (unless of course the readers are pointy haired bosses who dont have a clue)


I would even go the extent of saying that online recommendations should be completely discouraged. Because, any public recommendations are by default useless. As mentioned earlier, nobody will publish a bad recommendation. For that matter nobody will even write a bad public recommendation (its easy to get your hands on a knife).
The only reason I would still believe in them is the fact that the person recommending is putting his/her neck out for you. However two things should then be strictly followed

1. There should only be one line saying : "xyz recommends abc" Anything else is useless.
2. The person recommending you should have been in a position where he/she has supervised you. No friends, no colleagues. Recommendations from them are useless


Apart from the above, online recommendations are nothing but blinding flashes of the obvious. I recommend to keep recommendations private.

Cheers
Rishi

P.S. I myself have a couple of online recommendations. But I cannot remove them unless the other zillion idiots remove theirs. Otherwise I stand to be a loser. Maybe this is another reason why online recos are still popular. But that's herd mentatlity, no?

Are you really yourself ?

Have you tried comparing yourself to what you were 5 years back? Physically ? Emotionally ? Physical change is evident, Emotional change is less so. Both, however are inevitable. What you thought and expected from life 5-10 years ago is different from what you want now. Agree? Now, think about the decisions we make at any point in time. Decisions are made forward looking i.e for the future. e.g you decide to buy an insurance policy for "future" safety. Agree? Now, if things constantly change and decisions are made for the future, can we ever make any correct decisions? Alternatively, we are doomed to a lifetime of cribbing over how we made the wrong decision(s). Now you might argue that although we change physically and emotionally, there are core attributes that remain for lifetime. e.g our height does not change, our basic nature does not change. I would beg to differ. We change as per circumstances. Good can turn to bad and vice versa. e.g the loss of a loved one can turn a perfectly sweet person into a grouch and full of hatred. On the other hand, marrying someone good might turn your personality for the better. I am not saying that all people change dramatically over a lifetime. However people definitely change, for better or for worse, depending on circumstances.

My question is, should decision making then be relegated to a random choice? Or you think it is still better to make an "informed decesion" (whatever that means!!)

Cheers
Rishi

P.S: Dont give me examples of how some of your decisions have been good. Firstly you are only telling me the ones that turned good for you and secondly you have been lucky things worked out as you "assumed" they would when you took the decision. No ?